A lawsuit filed by a local branch of the Russian Orthodox Church against the director of the Novosibirsk State Academic Theater of Opera and Ballet was dismissed, but the case could indicate an increase in church influence.
Timofei Kulyabin intended his new staging of Richard Wagner’s opera Tannhauser at the Novosibirsk State Academic Theater of Opera and Ballet to explore “the theme of human existential solitude,” but the local representative of the Russian Orthodox Church found issue with the way it presented people coming together.
The church took Kulyabin, 30, to court over the staging of the opera, which has the protagonist, Heinrich Tannhauser, showing an audience an erotic film, Venus’ Grotto, which reveals a young Jesus’ carnal delights in the grotto of the goddess of love.
The critically acclaimed production premiered in December 2014 and the Kommersant called it of the 10 best premiers in Russia last year. But only a month after its first staging, a local church representative complained to the procurator’s office that Kulyabin and theater director Boris Mezdrich had intentionally defiled religious symbols. The procurator filed an administrative lawsuit against Kulyabin and Mezdrich for having publically desecrated the Gospel image of Jesus Christ – a crime that carries a fine of 200,000 rubles.
After receiving complaints from several citizens that the performance insulted believers, the local branch of Russia’s Investigative Committee opened an inquiry into charges that the production “violates the right to freedom of conscience and faith.” That crime that carries a punishment of one year of incarceration.
Orthodox activists also demanded that Tannhauser is excluded from the theater’s repertoire, although theater representatives already announced their intention “to defend its professional position and artistic policy.”
Meanwhile, an initiative collecting signatures in defense of the accused was launched on the Internet. The petition, which was signed by 50,000 people, also asked the court hearing the case to get opinions from independent experts, which it did.
After examining the case, Vladimir Vinokurov, a professor in the religious studies department at Moscow State University said: “The opera does not contain elements of religious reverence and liturgical literature.”
Another religious scholar, Boris Falikov, of the Russian State University of the Humanities, noted: “There are emblems and signs that represent ideological symbolism, but they are not sullied or destroyed.” He added, “Kulyabin does not want to offend anyone…. If the spectator identifies fantasy with reality and the protagonist with the author, this is a mistake.”
The case against Kulyabin was dismissed, but for the professional artistic community, the Tannhauser case is another sign that the church is trying to censor cultural works that it doesn’t like.
Alexander Kalyagin, president of the Russian Theatrical Union, said that the situation reminded him of recent demands “to take action” in relation to Andrei Zvyagintsev’s award-winning film Leviathan. “I wouldn’t like to return to the times of raging censorship,” Kalyagin said.
Oleg Tabakov, artistic director of the Moscow Art Theater, wrote on the theater’s Facebook page: “The fact that a criminal lawsuit has been filed against the artistic work, as controversial and ambiguous as it is, cannot but evoke alarm,” and President of the Guild of Theatrical Directors Valery Fokin told the procurator’s office that the negative reaction of just one of the many segments of the audience “cannot be the basis for public discussion,” or “a reason for inviting the author to the procurator’s office.”
This post first appeared on Russia Beyond on March 12, 2015, and has been reposted with permission.
This post was written by the author in their personal capacity.The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect the view of The Theatre Times, their staff or collaborators.
This post was written by Yekaterina Sinelschikova.
The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.