The past can often hang like a nightmare on the present. And, in the case of Jewish identity, this haunting can have terrible psychological consequences, a situation which has been considerably exacerbated by the recent rise in anti-Semitism. So the main theme of Israeli playwright Maya Arad Yasur’s new play, Jewish identity today, is certainly relevant. But this version’s publicity claim that the 80-minute drama, which was first produced at the Haifa Theater in 2018, is an “audacious thriller” and “strikingly original” gives a misleading impression and will probably lead to disappointed audiences.

That said, the central plot idea is intriguing. A nameless Israeli violinist, living in a lovely canal-side flat in Amsterdam, is nine months pregnant. As she waits to give birth, visiting her local supermarket, an ante-natal clinic and talking to her agent, her neighbor pops a utilities bill under her door. She doesn’t really understand Dutch very well so she can’t make out what it says. When a native speaker, at a night club, helps her out she is shocked to discover that this is a gas bill, for 1,700 Euros, and it’s dated 1944. Of course, the connotations of the word “gas” and the date resonate with memories of the Holocaust.

But this gas bill also poses a puzzle: who was it originally addressed to, and why didn’t they pay it? The final sum includes accumulated penalties for late payments, and apparently these bills have been arriving at regular intervals over the years. As the story of the bill develops, Yasur gives a deep sense of how oppressive the weight of Jewish identity can be, even in a tolerant country such as the Netherlands (where actually, she reminds us, 75 per cent of the Jewish population was murdered during the Final Solution). Tolerant, or not, the shadows of the past can color the experience of the present, and there are a couple of neat twists as this tale takes shape.

For me, the problem with the play is not the content, but the form. Yasur has adopted the idea of an open text, where the dialogue is divided into sections, but not ascribed to any characters. With no character names, and a freewheeling storytelling form, the play is a piece of narration which challenges us from the beginning. It forces us to ask: who is telling this story of an Israeli violinist? And why are they creating the narrative’s episodes together and with such imaginative zeal? Are they screen writers at a conference, or students on a writing course, or theatre-makers creating a show?

Any answer is possible. Matthew Xia’s production, his first as the new artistic director of the Actors Touring Company, choses to stage the play by using four actors, so the story of how a house might contain within its present structure the memory of the past (Anne Frank’s Amsterdam house, with its secret chambers, is mentioned in passing) is told in the shape of a meta-theatrical show, with the actors moving freely across the stage, and making use of a bell and microphone whenever they need to read out one of the text’s many footnotes. Eran Edry’s translation is clear and full of character, but it’s not long before the piece starts to annoy.

The thing that will immediately strike anyone who has followed recent new writing is that this play’s form is very familiar. Far from being “strikingly original”, Amsterdam is heavily indebted to Martin Crimp’s Fewer Emergencies style, down to the repeated use of “That’s right” as a verbal marker, and the open text likewise carries echoes of Sarah Kane and Caryl Churchill. In Yasur’s case, this Crimpian quality is less surreal and less brief than the original, and seems tricksy rather than profound. In effect, the result is less of a “audacious thriller” than of a fantasy exploration of history and personal identity. There’s plenty of good material: it’s the form that jars.

When her pregnant violist talks about her composition of a concerto called The Starling Paradox, Yasur uses the metaphor of the flight of starlings, when the birds swoop and turn in perfect synchronicity, and makes a strong point about how minorities need to protect themselves. There are also good patches of writing about how we imagine the second world war with a mixture of retrospective blame and heroic fantasy. Amid the grim humor of some of the episodes, where anti-Semitism can be experienced even in moments of gynecological intimacy, there are textual games with language and perceptive points about European culture.

Most of the work, however, is done by the actors. The ensemble—Daniel Abelson, Fiston Barek, Michal Horowicz and Hara Yannas—are a dynamic and well-grounded stage presence, despite some moments of rather too frantic rushing around. Each of the actors gives their voice a discernible character, although Xia could have worked harder on making this clearer. The sparse props, in Naomi Kuyuk-Cohen’s design, which include a 1940s typewriter and desk, could also have been used in a more coherent way, and a scene change in the middle of the evening feels a bit unnecessary, despite the chilling Nazi marching song. Yet some moments are memorable: whenever the word “genocide” is uttered, a long silence follows, which creates dramatic tension. In the end, you are left with a strong sense of how any house might be impregnated with haunting memories.

Amsterdam is at the Orange Tree Theatre until October 12.


This post was written by the author in their personal capacity.The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect the view of The Theatre Times, their staff or collaborators.

This post was written by Aleks Sierz.

The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.