Theatre conventions are a funny thing. Nowadays, it’s actually quite difficult to see a modern classic dressed in the clothes and performed on the set of its specific historical period. It has to be in contemporary dress. And in a contemporary setting. It’s almost as if producers and directors no longer trust audiences to use their imaginations — poor public, it has to be spoonfed. Ivo van Hove, perhaps the most exciting theatre director since Katie Mitchell, has taken Henrik Ibsen’s 1891 masterpiece and, with help from playwright Patrick Marber, updated it. He’s also cast Ruth Wilson as Hedda, so expectations on press night were high.
The first surprise is that this contemporary version has a plainness that defies location in any specific time and place. Is it England? Is it Norway? Is it America? Yes, and no. All and nothing. There are no mobile phones, no i-Pads and Marber’s dialogues are deliberately simple, direct, and essentially characterless. This is playwriting with the blood and sweat drained out of it. If there is an advantage of this no-placeness and no-timeness it is in the neutrality of the backdrop for Wilson’s Hedda. One of literature’s women we love to hate — of Austen’s Emma, Flaubert’s Madame Bovary, and Tolstoy’s Anna — Hedda is a great part: disappointed in her marriage to the boring academic Tesman, attracted by the bohemian Lovborg and flirting with the oppressively powerful Judge Brack, she is manipulative, cowardly, petulant, mischievous and, eventually, destructive.
With her crooked smile, and almost feline presence, Wilson is more irritating than sympathetic, conveying increasing suggestions of malignity and dark fantasies as the story unfolds. At one moment her eyes gleam with mute satisfaction as she sees her dream of making things happen, of affecting the men in her life irrevocably, come true; at another she punches the air in triumph. By turns radiating thoughtfulness and then selfishness, Wilson is good at conveying Hedda’s lack of enthusiasm for motherhood. You can’t imagine her with a babe in arms. Nor is she a high-class lady, and Van Hove has her padding around the stage in bare feet and slip (a visual reminder of her vulnerability perhaps).
The director also gives her one exaggerated outburst, which sees her shred a dozen bouquets of flowers, throwing them around the stage and them stapling some of them to the bare walls of her new house. Although the empty space and simple furnishings, as well as the sublime lighting (both designed by Jan Versweyveld), are effectively atmospheric, I thought that Van Hove’s directing too often veers away from the stillness of emotional truth, and towards the showy exaggerations of histrionic performance: his actors open their arms expansively, they touch each other’s hands compulsively. They hug the walls. They chat to the audience more often than to each other. They all seem to have the same repertoire of moves and expressions.
While this mannerism improves as the evening tiptoes towards its tragic climax, the worst is at the end. It’s no spoiler to say that the bully Brack, with a mix of persuasion and blackmail, pushes Hedda into a suicidal dead end. We know this because Ibsen’s playtext shows us that this is happening. But is this enough for Van Hove? Not at all. He must underline the point, using a coke can of blood, wagging his finger at us as if to say, “Hey people, you couldn’t understand this if I didn’t make it crystal clear!” Sadly, this excessive over-directing just annoyed me. It might also enrage women (as if we need more images of humiliated females). I wanted to love this show, but its director managed to put me right off.
Wilson’s performance is ably supported by an international cast which includes Kyle Soller’s nerdish and nervous Tesman, Chukwudi Iwuji’s passionate and exciting Lovborg and a rather miscast Rafe Spall (neither old enough, nor sinister enough) as Brack. There is also good work from Kate Duchêne as Tesman’s Aunt and Sinéad Matthews as Mrs Elvsted, Lovborg’s acolyte. With a soundtrack dominated by Joni Mitchell’s “Blue,” and stage pictures as carefully constructed as a painting, this is an evening that is more visually satisfying than emotionally engaging. If you are in the mood to forgive its excesses, then Wilson is a memorable Hedda, switching neatly between kittenish curiosity and icy wickedness. If not, then its mannered staging is a turn off.
This post was written by the author in their personal capacity.The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect the view of The Theatre Times, their staff or collaborators.
This post was written by Aleks Sierz.
The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.